Python – Développeurs
Vous recherchez les meilleures entreprises et freelancers Python IT dans le monde entier? Wadline présente les meilleurs fournisseurs spécialisés dans le développement web, les applications mobiles, le design et plus encore. Trouvez votre équipe Python idéale dès aujourd'hui!
Développement de produits numériques au Kazakhstan et en Russie à partir de 2021
- Projet min.
- $30k+
En tant qu'entreprise de développement web et mobile, nous créons différents projets.
Développement d'applications Web, d'applications mobiles pour iOS et Android, d'applications de bureau,&nbs...
- Projet min.
- $3k+
Nous concevons et développons des produits numériques, des services et des sites web depuis 15 ans.
- Projet min.
- $30k+
Depuis 2019 · 11-50 employés
Increase business performance by creating and supporting comprehensive business solutions. Offer consultations, teach and implement sophisticated products, change processes, help u…
- Projet min.
- $20k+
- Taux horaire
- $50–$100/h
Irving · Depuis 2004 · 201-500 employés
Your Trusted Technology Partner
Before you shortlist anyone
All calculatorsThe short answer
335 Python companies are listed. 65% publish a minimum project budget; the median floor is $10k. Most work starts in the $3–10k range. Median published rate is $25/hr across 27 companies.
Best supplied: USA (27) · Ukraine (17) · Inde (12)
Recalculated 2026-10-07 from live profiles.
What it costs, by country
Each cell counts companies whose published minimum project budget falls in that band. Only countries with at least 5 listed companies appear.
| Country | under $3k | $3–10k | $10–20k | $20–30k | $30k+ | Median rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| USA27Widest choice | — | 2 | 3 | 5 | 6 | $40/hr |
| Ukraine17 | — | 6 | 1 | 4 | — | — |
| Inde12 | — | 2 | 3 | — | 2 | — |
| Pologne8 | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | — |
| Royaume-Uni6 | 1 | 3 | — | 1 | — | — |
How this table is built
- Figures are minimum project budgets companies publish on their own profiles — the floor below which they decline work, not the price of a finished project.
- USD only. Companies quote in six currencies and averaging across them produces a number nobody charges.
- Budgets outside $300–$2,000,000 and rates outside $5–$500/hr are dropped as data-entry errors.
- A country needs 5 listed companies for a row, and 5 published rates before a median rate is shown.
What will your budget reach?
Move the slider. Every figure below is a count of companies whose published minimum project budget sits at or under that amount.
68 of 217 companies (31%) take projects at this size.
Where the entry thresholds sit
- under $3k
- 8
- $3–10k
- 60
- $10–20k
- 57
- $20–30k
- 52
- $30k+
- 40
Goes furthest in Ukraine — 6 companies
This says who will engage, not what your scope should cost. A budget that reaches most of the market still buys very different things depending on what you are building.
Who is focused, and who has proved it
Horizontal: how concentrated a company is on Python. Vertical: how much checkable evidence stands behind it. 57 of 335 companies are plotted — the rest have fewer than 2 evidence signals, so placing them would be guesswork.
- SATVASPACELeaders
- Friendly_MarketingLeaders
- SimbirSoftLeaders
- Digital Agency MOBIOSLeaders
- DD PlanetLeaders
- GMILeaders
How a company is placed
- Focus is the inverse of how many categories a company claims, blended with the share of its portfolio tagged with this one. A firm listing three technologies is concentrated; a firm listing forty also appears here.
- Proven delivery adds published reviews (to 20), portfolio projects (to 25), Ahrefs Domain Rating (to 60) and years listed (to 10). Each is capped so no single signal carries a company to the top.
- Positions are relative to the other companies on this page: the median company sits at the centre of each axis, so a quadrant boundary means "ahead of half the companies listed here". Raw scores are in each bubble's tooltip.
- Deliberately excluded: the star rating, which sits in too narrow a band to separate anyone; the editorial rank, which is a hand-assigned sort weight; and paid verification, which does not move anything on this chart.
- Leaders:
- Concentrated on this work and with the record to show for it.
- Specialists:
- This is most of what they do, but the public evidence is still thin.
- Established generalists:
- A substantial track record, spread across many categories.
- Emerging:
- Building both focus and evidence.
Avis clients sur Python
eTecc / Interactive
Horrible service. Refr ain from using this company
W2S Solutions
Best Mobile App Development company in Chennai, India.
Anadea
Projets de portfolio
Pourquoi faire confiance à Wadline
Wadline est une plateforme de confiance pour trouver des entreprises et agences IT. Nous aidons les entreprises à prendre des décisions éclairées grâce à des avis vérifiés et des informations transparentes.
Avis clients vérifiés
Chaque avis sur Wadline est vérifié. Nous confirmons l'authenticité des retours clients en vérifiant les détails du projet, les délais et les résultats.
Classements basés sur les données
Nos classements d'entreprises sont basés sur les données. Chaque entreprise est évaluée selon son expertise, son expérience, la qualité de son portfolio et la satisfaction client.
Portée mondiale
Wadline connecte les entreprises du monde entier avec des partenaires technologiques fiables. Notre plateforme présente des entreprises de nombreux pays.
Transparence totale
Des avis vérifiés aux portfolios en passant par les services et la tarification, Wadline offre une vue complète de chaque entreprise pour des décisions éclairées.
Nous évaluons les prestataires selon une méthodologie structurée combinant interviews clients, analyse de portfolio et évaluation de la présence sur le marché.
En savoir plus sur notre méthodologie →Explorer avec l'IA
Obtenez un résumé IA des meilleures entreprises de cette catégorie. Cliquez sur un service pour analyser cette page.